המשבר החקיקתי כמשבר הגמוני: המאבק הלא פתור בין הבלוק הפופוליסטי המדיר ובין הבלוק הבורגני

Translated title of the contribution: The Constitutional Crisis as a Crisis of Hegemony:The Unresolved Struggle between the ExclusionaryPopulist Bloc and the Bourgeois Bloc

דני פילק, אמית אביגור-אשל

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the present paper we argue that the current crisis created by the government’s intention to put forward a significant reform of the juridical system and it’s relation with the other branches of government is a multi-dimensionalcrisis. The first level of the crisis is the clash between an exclusionary populistvision of democracy and a liberal constitutional one. The second level is the crisis created by the lack of definition of the hegemonic struggle between two historical blocs advancing different models of society and expressing Israel’s ethno-classstratification. The third and last level is represented by the implications of the juridical reform on Israel’s growth model and on the mechanisms that legitimate it due to the fact that neither historical bloc, albeit the differences between the two,has an alternative to the current growth model.
Translated title of the contributionThe Constitutional Crisis as a Crisis of Hegemony:The Unresolved Struggle between the ExclusionaryPopulist Bloc and the Bourgeois Bloc
Original languageHebrew
Pages (from-to)119-129
Number of pages11
Journalסוציולוגיה ישראלית: כתב-עת לחקר החברה הישראלית
Volume24
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Constitutional Crisis as a Crisis of Hegemony:The Unresolved Struggle between the ExclusionaryPopulist Bloc and the Bourgeois Bloc'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this