A Comparison between r-LH and urinary supplements containing LH activity in patients undergoing the microdose GnRH agonist flare protocol for in-vitro fertilization: A pilot study

Tal Shavit, Mohammed Agdi, Weon Young Son, Josseph Hasson, Michael H. Dahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare pregnancy rates and stimulation parameters in patients with diminished ovarian reserve, who were treated with recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-LH) or menopausal gonadotropins (hMG), as part of a microdose flare protocol. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Comparisons between the group that was stimulated with r-LH plus follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) to those treated with hMG and FSH, were performed. Measurements included: medication doses, number of oocyte collected, number of embryos obtained, pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates. RESULTS: Patients in the r-LH group (N.=40) had significant higher clinical pregnancy rates (33% vs. 14%; P=0.04) and used lower dose of LH (1938 IU vs. 2807 IU; P=0.02) compared to patients that were stimulated with hMG (N.=39). CONCLUSIONS: r-LH may offer advantages for the treatment of diminished ovarian reserve when performing a microdose flare protocol when compared to hMG. Both larger and prospective studies should be carried out to confirm these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-399
Number of pages7
JournalMinerva Ginecologica
Volume68
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Diminished ovarian reserve
  • Human menopausal gonadotropins
  • IVF outcomes
  • Multidose flare protocol
  • Recombinant luteinizing hormone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison between r-LH and urinary supplements containing LH activity in patients undergoing the microdose GnRH agonist flare protocol for in-vitro fertilization: A pilot study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this