TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison between the effectiveness of epidural analgesia and parenteral pethidine during labor
AU - Sheiner, Eyal
AU - Shoham-Vardi, Iliana
AU - Sheiner, Einat K.
AU - Press, Fernanda
AU - Hackmon-Ram, Rinat
AU - Mazor, Moshe
AU - Katz, Miriam
PY - 2000/1/1
Y1 - 2000/1/1
N2 - The study was aimed to define parturients' opinion on either epidural analgesia or intravenous pethidine, and to determine the effect of both analgesics after delivery. We interviewed and examined 401 consecutive parturients who requested analgesia during the beginning of their active stage of labor. Of those, 131 women requested and underwent epidural analgesia, and 270 received parenteral pethidine. The pain experienced before admission of any analgesia, was significantly higher in the epidural group than in the parental group (mean visual analog scale (VAS) score 8.9 and 8.4, respectively; P = 0.004). However, after analgesics, women from the epidural analgesia experienced significantly less pain during labor as compared to those receiving pethidine (mean VAS scores 5.05 vs. 9.14, respectively; p < 0.001). The pain scores 24 h after labor were significantly lower in patients who underwent epidural analgesia (1.69 vs. 2.13, respectively; p < 0.001). We conclude that epidural analgesia is more effective than parenteral analgesia in pain and discomfort relief. This method is helpful also the day after delivery. Thus, epidural analgesia should be strongly recommended to all patients who do not have any medical contraindications to this method of treatment.
AB - The study was aimed to define parturients' opinion on either epidural analgesia or intravenous pethidine, and to determine the effect of both analgesics after delivery. We interviewed and examined 401 consecutive parturients who requested analgesia during the beginning of their active stage of labor. Of those, 131 women requested and underwent epidural analgesia, and 270 received parenteral pethidine. The pain experienced before admission of any analgesia, was significantly higher in the epidural group than in the parental group (mean visual analog scale (VAS) score 8.9 and 8.4, respectively; P = 0.004). However, after analgesics, women from the epidural analgesia experienced significantly less pain during labor as compared to those receiving pethidine (mean VAS scores 5.05 vs. 9.14, respectively; p < 0.001). The pain scores 24 h after labor were significantly lower in patients who underwent epidural analgesia (1.69 vs. 2.13, respectively; p < 0.001). We conclude that epidural analgesia is more effective than parenteral analgesia in pain and discomfort relief. This method is helpful also the day after delivery. Thus, epidural analgesia should be strongly recommended to all patients who do not have any medical contraindications to this method of treatment.
KW - Epidural analgesia
KW - Labor
KW - Pain
KW - Parenteral pethidine
KW - Visual analog scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034060163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s004040050003
DO - 10.1007/s004040050003
M3 - Article
C2 - 10763834
AN - SCOPUS:0034060163
SN - 0932-0067
VL - 263
SP - 95
EP - 98
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 3
ER -