A framework for economics-driven assessment of data quality decisions

Adir Even, Marcus Kaiser

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Economic perspectives have raised growing attention in recent data quality (DQ) literature, as studies have associated DQ decisions with major cost-benefit tradeoffs. Despite the growing interest, DQ research has not yet developed a robust, agreedupon view for assessing and studying the link between DQ and economic outcome. As a contribution, this study proposes a framework, which links costs to the decisions made in managing the information process and improving the DQ, and benefits to the use of information-product outcomes by data consumers. Considering past research contributions, we develop this framework further into a high-level optimization model that permits quantitative assessment of cost-benefit tradeoffs, towards economically-optimal DQ decisions. We demonstrate a possible use of the proposed framework and the derived model, and highlight their potential contribution to an economics-driven view of DQ issues in both research and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication15th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2009, AMCIS 2009
Pages3572-3578
Number of pages7
Volume6
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2009
Event15th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2009, AMCIS 2009 - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: 6 Aug 20099 Aug 2009

Conference

Conference15th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2009, AMCIS 2009
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period6/08/099/08/09

Keywords

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Data Management
  • Data Quality
  • Information Process
  • Information Product
  • Metrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A framework for economics-driven assessment of data quality decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this