TY - JOUR
T1 - A fresh view of the tsunami generated by the dead sea transform, 1995 Mw 7.2 Nuweiba earthquake, along the Gulf of Elat–Aqaba
AU - Frucht, Eran
AU - Salamon, Amos
AU - Gal, Erez
AU - Ginat, Hanan
AU - Grigorovitch, Marina
AU - Tov, Rachamim Shem
AU - Ward, Steve
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the Survey of Israel (SI) staff members Yossi Melzer, Boris Shirman, Baruch Peretzman, and Yaron Felus for providing the mareogram of the 1995 Nuweiba tsunami. S. D. Rosen, Sea Shore Rosen Coastal Engineering Consultants, is highly appreciated for providing the tide scale at the time of the 1995 earthquake in the Gulf of Elat–Aqaba (GOE). Rani Calvo and Alex Borshevsky supported Geographic Information Systems (GIS) figure editing. The Inter-Ministerial Steering Committee for Earthquake Preparedness of Israel and the Ministry of Energy are greatly appreciated for supporting this project. The Ministry of Science is highly appreciated for continuous support of H. G. and R. S. T. at the Dead Sea and Arava Science Center (DSASC). Finally, the authors thank the reviewers for their incisive reading and constructive comments that helped improving the article and acknowledge Editor-in-Chief Zhigang Peng for handling their submission.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Seismological Society of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - The tsunami that followed the 1995 Mw 7.2 Nuweiba earthquake along the Dead Sea Transform in the Gulf of Elat–Aqaba (GOE) surprised the local population, who were unconcerned by seismogenic sea waves happening in a closed gulf, far away from the open ocean. Eyewitness reports, field observations, and a mareogram recorded near Elat demonstrated conclusively that tsunami hazard in the GOE deserves focused attention. Here we take up the challenge, adopting the GeoClaw package and investigating which of the available Nuweiba earthquake models are capable of better replicating the actual findings. In general, the simulated tsunamis that are based on both the seismological and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) Nuweiba earthquake models are in line with the eyewitness descriptions of wave height, slight inundation, and limited damage. In addition, the simulations show a reasonable correlation with the amplitude and wave period derived from the analog mareogram, as expected from a tsunamigenic, mostly strike-slip component earthquake. The InSAR inverse-based modeling of the coseismic deformation, however, appears closer to the measured parameters of the recorded mareogram. The exception of 3–4 m high waves reported in the Nuweiba port may be the result of local perturbations in the harbor or the effect of a local tsunamigenic submarine landslide. The four countries of Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt that encircle the GOE seek to expand intensively their marine infrastructure, tourism, and population. The present study aims to warn the stakeholders around the GOE about the inevitable tsunamis.
AB - The tsunami that followed the 1995 Mw 7.2 Nuweiba earthquake along the Dead Sea Transform in the Gulf of Elat–Aqaba (GOE) surprised the local population, who were unconcerned by seismogenic sea waves happening in a closed gulf, far away from the open ocean. Eyewitness reports, field observations, and a mareogram recorded near Elat demonstrated conclusively that tsunami hazard in the GOE deserves focused attention. Here we take up the challenge, adopting the GeoClaw package and investigating which of the available Nuweiba earthquake models are capable of better replicating the actual findings. In general, the simulated tsunamis that are based on both the seismological and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) Nuweiba earthquake models are in line with the eyewitness descriptions of wave height, slight inundation, and limited damage. In addition, the simulations show a reasonable correlation with the amplitude and wave period derived from the analog mareogram, as expected from a tsunamigenic, mostly strike-slip component earthquake. The InSAR inverse-based modeling of the coseismic deformation, however, appears closer to the measured parameters of the recorded mareogram. The exception of 3–4 m high waves reported in the Nuweiba port may be the result of local perturbations in the harbor or the effect of a local tsunamigenic submarine landslide. The four countries of Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt that encircle the GOE seek to expand intensively their marine infrastructure, tourism, and population. The present study aims to warn the stakeholders around the GOE about the inevitable tsunamis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072701192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1785/0220190004
DO - 10.1785/0220190004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85072701192
SN - 0895-0695
VL - 90
SP - 1483
EP - 1493
JO - Seismological Research Letters
JF - Seismological Research Letters
IS - 4
ER -