A Moral Argument Against Absolute Authority of the Torah

Dan Baras

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this article, I will argue against the Orthodox Jewish view that the Torah should be treated as an absolute authority. I begin with an explanation of what it means to treat something as an absolute authority. I then review examples of norms in the Torah that seem clearly immoral. Next, I explore reasons that people may have for accepting a person, text, or tradition as an absolute authority in general. I argue that none of these reasons can justify absolute authority if the authority prescribes norms that we strongly judge to be immoral. I then respond to three objections to my argument. I end with a note explaining why, contrary to a popular trend, the narrative of the binding of Isaac is not a good place to start this discussion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-329
Number of pages23
JournalSophia
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Absolute authority
  • Jewish philosophy
  • Morality and religion
  • Religious authority

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Moral Argument Against Absolute Authority of the Torah'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this