TY - JOUR
T1 - A predator equalizes rate of capture of a schooling prey in a patchy environment
AU - Vijayan, Sundararaj
AU - Kotler, Burt P.
AU - Abramsky, Zvika
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Israel Science Foundation grant 05/14 to Zvika Abramsky for supporting this research. We thank Merav W. Katz, Reut Vardi, Ofir Altestein, Avi Koplovich, and Lotan Tov Elem for their candid comments and suggestions. SV is grateful to the Azrieli Foundation for the award of Azrieli Post-Doctoral Fellowship at Ben-Gurion University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Prey individuals are often distributed heterogeneously in the environment, and their abundances and relative availabilities vary among patches. A foraging predator should maximize energetic gains by selectively choosing patches with higher prey density. However, catching behaviorally responsive and group-forming prey in patchy environments can be a challenge for predators. First, they have to identify the profitable patches, and second, they must manage the prey's sophisticated anti-predator behavior. Thus, the forager and its prey have to continuously adjust their behavior to that of their opponent. Given these conditions, the foraging predator's behavior should be dynamic with time in terms of foraging effort and prey capture rates across different patches. Theoretically, the allocation of its time among patches of behaviorally responsive prey should be such that it equalizes its prey capture rates across patches through time. We tested this prediction in a model system containing a predator (little egret) and group-forming prey (common gold fish) in two sets of experiments in which (1) patches (pools) contained equal numbers of prey, or in which (2) patches contained unequal densities of prey. The egret equalized the prey capture rate through time in both equal and different density experiments.
AB - Prey individuals are often distributed heterogeneously in the environment, and their abundances and relative availabilities vary among patches. A foraging predator should maximize energetic gains by selectively choosing patches with higher prey density. However, catching behaviorally responsive and group-forming prey in patchy environments can be a challenge for predators. First, they have to identify the profitable patches, and second, they must manage the prey's sophisticated anti-predator behavior. Thus, the forager and its prey have to continuously adjust their behavior to that of their opponent. Given these conditions, the foraging predator's behavior should be dynamic with time in terms of foraging effort and prey capture rates across different patches. Theoretically, the allocation of its time among patches of behaviorally responsive prey should be such that it equalizes its prey capture rates across patches through time. We tested this prediction in a model system containing a predator (little egret) and group-forming prey (common gold fish) in two sets of experiments in which (1) patches (pools) contained equal numbers of prey, or in which (2) patches contained unequal densities of prey. The egret equalized the prey capture rate through time in both equal and different density experiments.
KW - Anti-predatory behavior
KW - Foraging behavior
KW - Group forming
KW - Optimal foraging
KW - Patch
KW - Predator–prey interactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014137412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.016
DO - 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85014137412
SN - 0376-6357
VL - 138
SP - 91
EP - 95
JO - Behavioural Processes
JF - Behavioural Processes
ER -