TY - GEN
T1 - A relevance-based compilation method for Conformant probabilistic planning
AU - Taig, Ran
AU - Brafman, Ronen I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Conformant probabilistic planning (CPP) differs from conformant planning (CP) by two key elements: the initial belief state is probabilistic, and the conformant plan must achieve the goal with probability ≥ θ, for some 0 < θ ≤ 1. In earlier work we observed that one can reduce CPP to CP by finding a set of initial states whose probability ≥ θ, for which a conformant plan exists. In previous solvers we used the underlying planner to select this set of states and to plan for them simultaneously. Here we suggest an alternative approach: start with relevance analysis to determine a promising set of initial states on which to focus. Then, call an off-the-shelf conformant planner to solve the resulting problem. This approach has a number of advantages. First, instead of depending on the heuristic function to select the set of initial slates, we can introduce specific, efficient relevance reasoning techniques. Second, we can benefit from optimizations used by conformant planners that are unsound when applied lo the original CPP. Finally, we are free to use any existing (or new) CP solver. Consequently, the new planner dominates previous solvers on almost all domains and scales to instances that were not solved before.
AB - Conformant probabilistic planning (CPP) differs from conformant planning (CP) by two key elements: the initial belief state is probabilistic, and the conformant plan must achieve the goal with probability ≥ θ, for some 0 < θ ≤ 1. In earlier work we observed that one can reduce CPP to CP by finding a set of initial states whose probability ≥ θ, for which a conformant plan exists. In previous solvers we used the underlying planner to select this set of states and to plan for them simultaneously. Here we suggest an alternative approach: start with relevance analysis to determine a promising set of initial states on which to focus. Then, call an off-the-shelf conformant planner to solve the resulting problem. This approach has a number of advantages. First, instead of depending on the heuristic function to select the set of initial slates, we can introduce specific, efficient relevance reasoning techniques. Second, we can benefit from optimizations used by conformant planners that are unsound when applied lo the original CPP. Finally, we are free to use any existing (or new) CP solver. Consequently, the new planner dominates previous solvers on almost all domains and scales to instances that were not solved before.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908152919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84908152919
T3 - Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
SP - 2374
EP - 2380
BT - Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
PB - AI Access Foundation
T2 - 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2014, 26th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2014 and the 5th Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2014
Y2 - 27 July 2014 through 31 July 2014
ER -