Abstract
Based on self-determination theory and research, we suggest that SEL programs should focus primarily on enhancing teachers' capacity to support students' basic psychological needs via practices that mostly do not involve teaching of skills via a pre-determined curriculum. This view is based on evidence that teachers can best facilitate students' socioemotional functioning and well-being by prac-tices supporting their needs. Teaching socioemotional skills may also contribute to need satisfaction and subsequent optimal functioning, but only when teachers support students' needs. Given that the learning and effective application of need-supporting practices is a very demanding task, social and emotional learning (SEL) programs should invest most of their efforts in enhancing teachers' capacity to apply need-supporting practices, rather than in teaching a curriculum of skills. We show that there is no conclusive evidence for the effectiveness of SEL programs focusing only on skills. We describe the negative effects that programs focusing only on skills teaching may have on teachers' thinking, practice, and role definition and on resource allocation by policymakers. Moreover, skills-only programs may contribute to the missing of an important opportunity to use the current interest in SEL as a catalyst for a significant change in the ways teachers relate to their students and construct learning processes and contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Pages | 269-294 |
Number of pages | 26 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9789819978977 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789819978960 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 21 Dec 2023 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
- General Psychology