TY - JOUR
T1 - A specter of coexistence
T2 - Is centrifugal community organization haunted by the ghost of competition?
AU - Wasserberg, Gideon
AU - Kotler, Burt P.
AU - Morris, Douglas W.
AU - Abramsky, Zvika
N1 - Funding Information:
staff for the hospitality and logistic support, and Natalia Wasserberg for assisting in the fieldwork. Special thanks to Michael L. Rosenzweig for discussing and critiquing a previous draft of this paper and to the subject-editor Ofer Ovadia for the efficient processing of this paper. This research was supported by the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) grant number 93-00059. This is publication number 561 of the Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology.
PY - 2006/1/1
Y1 - 2006/1/1
N2 - In a centrifugally organized community species prefer the same habitat (called "core") but differ in their secondary habitat preferences. The first model of centrifugal community organization (CCO) predicted that optimally foraging, symmetrically competing species would share use of the core habitat at all density combinations. But one might also assume that the competition in the core habitat is asymmetrical, that is, that one of the species (the dominant) has a behavioral advantage therein. In this study, we asked how should habitat use evolve in a centrifugally organized community if its species compete asymmetrically in the core habitat? To address this question we developed an "isoleg model". The model predicts that in a centrifugally organized community, asymmetric competition promotes the use of the core habitat exclusively by the dominant species at most points in the state space. The separation of the core habitat use by the species ("the ghost of competition past") may be either complete or partial ("partial ghost"), and behavior at the stable competitive equilibrium between the species could determine whether coexistence should occur at the "complete-" or the "partial ghost" regions. This version of CCO should be a common feature of competitive systems.
AB - In a centrifugally organized community species prefer the same habitat (called "core") but differ in their secondary habitat preferences. The first model of centrifugal community organization (CCO) predicted that optimally foraging, symmetrically competing species would share use of the core habitat at all density combinations. But one might also assume that the competition in the core habitat is asymmetrical, that is, that one of the species (the dominant) has a behavioral advantage therein. In this study, we asked how should habitat use evolve in a centrifugally organized community if its species compete asymmetrically in the core habitat? To address this question we developed an "isoleg model". The model predicts that in a centrifugally organized community, asymmetric competition promotes the use of the core habitat exclusively by the dominant species at most points in the state space. The separation of the core habitat use by the species ("the ghost of competition past") may be either complete or partial ("partial ghost"), and behavior at the stable competitive equilibrium between the species could determine whether coexistence should occur at the "complete-" or the "partial ghost" regions. This version of CCO should be a common feature of competitive systems.
KW - Asymmetric competition
KW - Centrifugal community organization
KW - Density dependent habitat selection
KW - Ghost of competition past
KW - Isoleg
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250165388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1560/IJEE_52_2_123
DO - 10.1560/IJEE_52_2_123
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34250165388
SN - 1565-9801
VL - 52
SP - 123
EP - 140
JO - Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
JF - Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
IS - 2
ER -