Abstract
Several authors believe that there are certain facts that are striking and cry out for explanation—for instance, a coin that is tossed many times and lands in the alternating sequence HTHTHTHTHTHT… (H = heads, T = tails). According to this view, we have prima facie reason to believe that such facts are not the result of chance. I call this view the striking principle. Based on this principle, some have argued for far-reaching conclusions, such as that our universe was created by intelligent design, that there are many universes other than the one we inhabit, and that there are no mathematical or normative facts. Appealing as the view may initially seem, I argue that we lack sufficient reason to accept it.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1501-1514 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 177 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jun 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Calling for explanation
- Epistemic principles
- Fine-tuning arguments
- Probabilism
- Strikingness
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy