TY - JOUR
T1 - Academic admissions standards
T2 - Implications for output, distribution, and mobility
AU - Gilboa, Yaakov
AU - Justman, Moshe
PY - 2005/9/1
Y1 - 2005/9/1
N2 - We examine the trade-offs implicit in academic admissions standards when students are charged cost-based tuition and offered loans that remove liquidity constraints. Lowering entry requirements while holding graduation requirements fixed increases aggregate output and promotes a more equal distribution ofwages, but reduces relative income mobility and diminishes the scope for affirmative action. Lowering admissions standards while raising graduation requirements, so that the number of graduates remains constant, has little direct effect on output, distribution, or mobility, but again reduces the scope for affirmative action. Income-based affirmative action offers a better trade-off between output and relative mobility than income-neutral admissions.
AB - We examine the trade-offs implicit in academic admissions standards when students are charged cost-based tuition and offered loans that remove liquidity constraints. Lowering entry requirements while holding graduation requirements fixed increases aggregate output and promotes a more equal distribution ofwages, but reduces relative income mobility and diminishes the scope for affirmative action. Lowering admissions standards while raising graduation requirements, so that the number of graduates remains constant, has little direct effect on output, distribution, or mobility, but again reduces the scope for affirmative action. Income-based affirmative action offers a better trade-off between output and relative mobility than income-neutral admissions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68349161785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/1542476054729464
DO - 10.1162/1542476054729464
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:68349161785
VL - 3
SP - 1105
EP - 1133
JO - Journal of the European Economic Association
JF - Journal of the European Economic Association
SN - 1542-4774
IS - 5
ER -