Abstract
We examine the trade-offs implicit in academic admissions standards when students are charged cost-based tuition and offered loans that remove liquidity constraints. Lowering entry requirements while holding graduation requirements fixed increases aggregate output and promotes a more equal distribution ofwages, but reduces relative income mobility and diminishes the scope for affirmative action. Lowering admissions standards while raising graduation requirements, so that the number of graduates remains constant, has little direct effect on output, distribution, or mobility, but again reduces the scope for affirmative action. Income-based affirmative action offers a better trade-off between output and relative mobility than income-neutral admissions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1105-1133 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Journal of the European Economic Association |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Sep 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Academic admissions standards: Implications for output, distribution, and mobility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver