Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps in a screening population

  • Douglas K. Rex
  • , Samuel N. Adler
  • , James Aisenberg
  • , Wilmot C. Burch
  • , Cristina Carretero
  • , Yehuda Chowers
  • , Steven A. Fein
  • , Steven E. Fern
  • , Ignacio Fernandez-Urien Sainz
  • , Alexander Fich
  • , Eyal Gal
  • , John C. Horlander
  • , Kim L. Isaacs
  • , Revital Kariv
  • , Adi Lahat
  • , Wai Keung Leung
  • , Pramod R. Malik
  • , Doug Morgan
  • , Neofytos Papageorgiou
  • , David P. Romeo
  • Smita S. Shah, Matti Waterman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

189 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background & Aims Capsule colonoscopy is a minimally invasive imaging method. We measured the accuracy of this technology in detecting polyps 6 mm or larger in an average-risk screening population. Methods In a prospective study, asymptomatic subjects (n = 884) underwent capsule colonoscopy followed by conventional colonoscopy (the reference) several weeks later, with an endoscopist blinded to capsule results, at 10 centers in the United States and 6 centers in Israel from June 2011 through April 2012. An unblinded colonoscopy was performed on subjects found to have lesions 6 mm or larger by capsule but not conventional colonoscopy. Results Among the 884 subjects enrolled, 695 (79%) were included in the analysis of capsule performance for all polyps. There were 77 exclusions (9%) for inadequate cleansing and whole-colon capsule transit time fewer than 40 minutes, 45 exclusions (5%) before capsule ingestion, 15 exclusions (2%) after ingestion and before colonoscopy, and 15 exclusions (2%) for site termination. Capsule colonoscopy identified subjects with 1 or more polyps 6 mm or larger with 81% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 77%-84%) and 93% specificity (95% CI, 91%-95%), and polyps 10 mm or larger with 80% sensitivity (95% CI, 74%-86%) and 97% specificity (95% CI, 96%-98%). Capsule colonoscopy identified subjects with 1 or more conventional adenomas 6 mm or larger with 88% sensitivity (95% CI, 82%-93) and 82% specificity (95% CI, 80%-83%), and 10 mm or larger with 92% sensitivity (95% CI, 82%-97%) and 95% specificity (95% CI, 94%-95%). Sessile serrated polyps and hyperplastic polyps accounted for 26% and 37%, respectively, of false-negative findings from capsule analyses. Conclusions In an average-risk screening population, technically adequate capsule colonoscopy identified individuals with 1 or more conventional adenomas 6 mm or larger with 88% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Capsule performance seems adequate for patients who cannot undergo colonoscopy or who had incomplete colonoscopies. Additional studies are needed to improve capsule detection of serrated lesions. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT01372878.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)948-957.e2
JournalGastroenterology
Volume148
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Colon Cancer Detection
  • Colorectal Lesion
  • Diagnosis Tumor
  • Neoplasm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps in a screening population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this