TY - JOUR
T1 - Adhesion barriers and topical hemostatic agents are risk factors for post-cesarean section infections
AU - Erenberg, Miriam
AU - Rotem, Reut
AU - Segal, David
AU - Yohay, Zehava
AU - Idan, Inbal
AU - Yohay, David
AU - Weintraub, Adi Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Background: Cesarean sections are the most common surgery worldwide, and post-cesarean section infections and hemorrhage are a major cause for morbidity and mortality. In recent years, many surgeons use adhesion barriers as well as hemostatic agents during primary and repeated cesarean section. The data regarding the safety of these agents is relatively limited. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of adhesion barriers and topical hemostatic agents pose a risk for post-cesarean section infections. Method: A case-control study composed of women who were admitted to the Soroka University Medical Center between the years 2012 and 2016 was conducted. The study group was composed of women admitted owing to post-cesarean section infections (cases) and those who underwent cesarean sections without post-cesarean section infection (control subjects). Matching was done according to date and surgery setting (elective versus emergency). A univariate analysis was followed by a multiple regression model in order to examine the association between adhesion barriers/hemostatic agents and post-cesarean section infections. Results: During the study period, 113 patients developed postoperative infection (cases); 71.7% were diagnosed with surgical site infection, 7.1% with endometritis, and 21.2% with other infections. These were compared with 226 control subjects. In the univariate analysis, the use of adhesion barriers/hemostatic agents were found to be associated with post-cesarean section infection. Using a multivariable analysis controlling for previous cesarean section, skin closer technique, preterm delivery, and duration of surgery >60 minutes, the use of adhesion barriers as well as hemostatic agents was found to be independently associated with post-cesarean section infection (adjusted odds ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.17–3.84; adjusted odds ratio = 2.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.37–3.8, respectively) Conclusion: Adhesion barriers and hemostatic agents were found to be independently associated with post-cesarean section infections. Further larger studies are needed to reinforce our findings. The use of these materials should be carefully considered, and their cost-effectiveness re-examined.
AB - Background: Cesarean sections are the most common surgery worldwide, and post-cesarean section infections and hemorrhage are a major cause for morbidity and mortality. In recent years, many surgeons use adhesion barriers as well as hemostatic agents during primary and repeated cesarean section. The data regarding the safety of these agents is relatively limited. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of adhesion barriers and topical hemostatic agents pose a risk for post-cesarean section infections. Method: A case-control study composed of women who were admitted to the Soroka University Medical Center between the years 2012 and 2016 was conducted. The study group was composed of women admitted owing to post-cesarean section infections (cases) and those who underwent cesarean sections without post-cesarean section infection (control subjects). Matching was done according to date and surgery setting (elective versus emergency). A univariate analysis was followed by a multiple regression model in order to examine the association between adhesion barriers/hemostatic agents and post-cesarean section infections. Results: During the study period, 113 patients developed postoperative infection (cases); 71.7% were diagnosed with surgical site infection, 7.1% with endometritis, and 21.2% with other infections. These were compared with 226 control subjects. In the univariate analysis, the use of adhesion barriers/hemostatic agents were found to be associated with post-cesarean section infection. Using a multivariable analysis controlling for previous cesarean section, skin closer technique, preterm delivery, and duration of surgery >60 minutes, the use of adhesion barriers as well as hemostatic agents was found to be independently associated with post-cesarean section infection (adjusted odds ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.17–3.84; adjusted odds ratio = 2.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.37–3.8, respectively) Conclusion: Adhesion barriers and hemostatic agents were found to be independently associated with post-cesarean section infections. Further larger studies are needed to reinforce our findings. The use of these materials should be carefully considered, and their cost-effectiveness re-examined.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106294089&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.048
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.048
M3 - Article
C2 - 33933281
AN - SCOPUS:85106294089
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 170
SP - 1120
EP - 1124
JO - Surgery (United States)
JF - Surgery (United States)
IS - 4
ER -