Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: Evidence, and lack of it

Asnat Walfisch, Ron Beloosesky, Alon Shrim, Mordechai Hallak

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

In spite of the recognized occurrence of cesarean-attributable adhesions, its clinical significance is uncertain. The presence of adhesions during a repeat cesarean section can make fetal extraction lengthy and the procedure challenging and may increase the risk of injury to adjacent organs. Two methods for adhesion prevention are discussed, peritoneal closure and use of adhesion barriers. Peritoneal closure appears to be safe in the short term. In the long term, conflicting evidence arise from reviewing the literature for possible adhesion reduction benefits. A systematic review of the literature on the use of adhesion barriers in the context of cesarean section yielded only a few studies, most of which are lacking in methodology. For now, it appears that the available evidence does not support the routine use of adhesion barriers during cesarean delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)446-452
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume211
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adhesion barriers
  • pelvic adhesions
  • peritoneal closure
  • repeat cesarean section

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: Evidence, and lack of it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this