Aetiology of respiratory tract infections: Clinical assessment versus serological tests

D. Lieberman, P. Shvartzman, I. Korsonsky, D. Lieberman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Two hundred and fifty ambulatory patients with febrile respiratory tract infections were included in a prospective study, aimed at determining the reliability of physicians' judgements relating to the aetiology of the infection. Compared with advanced serological testing, physicians' judgements for a bacterial/atypical, rather than viral, aetiology had a negative predictive value of 60% and a positive predictive value of only 50%. We conclude that physicians' ability to assess whether the infectious aetiology of RTI is viral or bacterial/atypical is low and no more reliable than tossing a coin.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)998-1000
    Number of pages3
    JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
    Volume51
    Issue number473
    StatePublished - 27 Dec 2001

    Keywords

    • Aetiology
    • Clinical skill
    • Respiratory tract infection
    • Serological testing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Family Practice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Aetiology of respiratory tract infections: Clinical assessment versus serological tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this