Against strong cognitivism: An argument from caring

Hilla Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

According to 'strong cognitivism', all reasons for action are rooted in normative features that the motivated subject (explicitly or implicitly) takes objects to have (or lack) independently of her attitudes towards these objects. My main concern in this paper is to argue against strong cognitivism, that is, to establish the view that conative attitudes do provide subjects with reasons for action. My central argument to this effect is a top-down one that proceeds by an analysis of the complex phenomenon of caring and derives a conclusion regarding the (motivational and normative) nature of more basic mental phenomena - particular desires.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-158
Number of pages20
JournalDialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Against strong cognitivism: An argument from caring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this