ALK IHC and FISH discordant results in patients with NSCLC and treatment response: For discussion of the question - To treat or not to treat?

Florian Cabillic, Paul Hofman, Marius Ilie, Nir Peled, Maximilian Hochmair, Manfred Dietel, Maximilian Von Laffert, John R. Gosney, Fernando Lopez-Rios, Gilles Erb, Uwe Schalles, Fabrice Barlesi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide. Latest guidelines from the College of American Pathologist and the European society of medical oncologists indicate anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement testing is standard practice. Historically, diagnostics for ALK used fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH); however, immunohistochemical (IHC) assays are becoming common practice. Unfortunately, recent assessment of current practice indicated that not all patients who should be tested for ALK translocation are undergoing ALK testing. Methods From a series of European and Israeli labs, we collected patients with discordant IHC and FISH testing, which were subsequently treated with ALK-targeted therapy, for discussion of the question, to treat or not to treat? Results Our study may support ALK IHC testing as a better predictor of response to targeted therapy provided that the labs implement controlled preanalytical procedures, use correct clone, run protocols on automated staining platforms and validate using external quality assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000419
JournalESMO Open
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ALK
  • FISH
  • ISH
  • pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ALK IHC and FISH discordant results in patients with NSCLC and treatment response: For discussion of the question - To treat or not to treat?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this