TY - GEN
T1 - Amortized Closure and Its Applications in Lifting for Resolution over Parities
AU - Efremenko, Klim
AU - Itsykson, Dmitry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Klim Efremenko and Dmitry Itsykson.
PY - 2025/7/29
Y1 - 2025/7/29
N2 - The notion of closure of a set of linear forms, first introduced by Efremenko, Garlik, and Itsykson [14], has proven instrumental in proving lower bounds on the sizes of regular and bounded-depth Res(⊕) refutations [14, 3]. In this work, we present amortized closure, an enhancement that retains the properties of original closure [14] but offers tighter control on its growth. Specifically, adding a new linear form increases the amortized closure by at most one. We explore two applications that highlight the power of this new concept. Utilizing our newly defined amortized closure, we extend and provide a succinct and elegant proof of the recent lifting theorem by Chattopadhyay and Dvorak [10]. Namely we show that for an unsatisfiable CNF formula φ and a 1-stifling gadget g : {0, 1}ℓ → {0, 1}, if the lifted formula φ ◦ g has a tree-like Res(⊕) refutation of size 2d and width w, then φ has a resolution refutation of depth d and width w. The original theorem by Chattopadhyay and Dvorak [10] applies only to the more restrictive class of strongly stifling gadgets. As a more significant application of amortized closure, we show improved lower bounds for bounded-depth Res(⊕), extending the depth beyond that of Alekseev and Itsykson [3]. Our result establishes an exponential lower bound for depth-Ω(n log n) Res(⊕) refutations of lifted Tseitin formulas, a notable improvement over the existing depth-Ω(n log log n) Res(⊕) lower bound.
AB - The notion of closure of a set of linear forms, first introduced by Efremenko, Garlik, and Itsykson [14], has proven instrumental in proving lower bounds on the sizes of regular and bounded-depth Res(⊕) refutations [14, 3]. In this work, we present amortized closure, an enhancement that retains the properties of original closure [14] but offers tighter control on its growth. Specifically, adding a new linear form increases the amortized closure by at most one. We explore two applications that highlight the power of this new concept. Utilizing our newly defined amortized closure, we extend and provide a succinct and elegant proof of the recent lifting theorem by Chattopadhyay and Dvorak [10]. Namely we show that for an unsatisfiable CNF formula φ and a 1-stifling gadget g : {0, 1}ℓ → {0, 1}, if the lifted formula φ ◦ g has a tree-like Res(⊕) refutation of size 2d and width w, then φ has a resolution refutation of depth d and width w. The original theorem by Chattopadhyay and Dvorak [10] applies only to the more restrictive class of strongly stifling gadgets. As a more significant application of amortized closure, we show improved lower bounds for bounded-depth Res(⊕), extending the depth beyond that of Alekseev and Itsykson [3]. Our result establishes an exponential lower bound for depth-Ω(n log n) Res(⊕) refutations of lifted Tseitin formulas, a notable improvement over the existing depth-Ω(n log log n) Res(⊕) lower bound.
KW - closure of linear forms
KW - depth
KW - lifting
KW - lower bounds
KW - resolution over parities
KW - size vs depth tradeoff
KW - width
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012167222
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.8
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.8
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105012167222
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 40th Computational Complexity Conference, CCC 2025
A2 - Srinivasan, Srikanth
A2 - Srinivasan, Srikanth
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 40th Computational Complexity Conference, CCC 2025
Y2 - 5 August 2025 through 8 August 2025
ER -