TY - GEN
T1 - An Analysis of Tennenbaum’s Theorem in Constructive Type Theory
AU - Hermes, Marc
AU - Kirst, Dominik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Marc Hermes and Dominik Kirst
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Tennenbaum’s theorem states that the only countable model of Peano arithmetic (PA) with computable arithmetical operations is the standard model of natural numbers. In this paper, we use constructive type theory as a framework to revisit and generalize this result. The chosen framework allows for a synthetic approach to computability theory, by exploiting the fact that, externally, all functions definable in constructive type theory can be shown computable. We internalize this fact by assuming a version of Church’s thesis expressing that any function on natural numbers is representable by a formula in PA. This assumption allows for a conveniently abstract setup to carry out rigorous computability arguments and feasible mechanization. Concretely, we constructivize several classical proofs and present one inherently constructive rendering of Tennenbaum’s theorem, all following arguments from the literature. Concerning the classical proofs in particular, the constructive setting allows us to highlight differences in their assumptions and conclusions which are not visible classically. All versions are accompanied by a unified mechanization in the Coq proof assistant.
AB - Tennenbaum’s theorem states that the only countable model of Peano arithmetic (PA) with computable arithmetical operations is the standard model of natural numbers. In this paper, we use constructive type theory as a framework to revisit and generalize this result. The chosen framework allows for a synthetic approach to computability theory, by exploiting the fact that, externally, all functions definable in constructive type theory can be shown computable. We internalize this fact by assuming a version of Church’s thesis expressing that any function on natural numbers is representable by a formula in PA. This assumption allows for a conveniently abstract setup to carry out rigorous computability arguments and feasible mechanization. Concretely, we constructivize several classical proofs and present one inherently constructive rendering of Tennenbaum’s theorem, all following arguments from the literature. Concerning the classical proofs in particular, the constructive setting allows us to highlight differences in their assumptions and conclusions which are not visible classically. All versions are accompanied by a unified mechanization in the Coq proof assistant.
KW - Church’s thesis
KW - Coq
KW - Peano arithmetic
KW - Tennenbaum’s theorem
KW - constructive type theory
KW - first-order logic
KW - synthetic computability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133692619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.9
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.9
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85133692619
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 7th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction, FSCD 2022
A2 - Felty, Amy P.
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 7th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction, FSCD 2022
Y2 - 2 August 2022 through 5 August 2022
ER -