An axiomatic treatment of three qualitative decision criteria

Ronen I. Brafman, Moshe Tennenholtz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations


The need for computationally efficient decision-making techniques together with the desire to simplify the processes of knowledge acquisition and agent specification have led various researchers in artificial intelligence to examine qualitative decision tools. However, the adequacy of such tools is not clear. This paper investigates the foundations of maximin, minmax regret, and competitive ratio, three central qualitative decision criteria, by characterizing those behaviors that could result from their use. This characterization provides two important insights: (1) under what conditions can we employ an agent model based on these basic qualitative decision criteria, and (2) how "rational" are these decision procedures. For the competitive ratio criterion in particular, this latter issue is of central importance to our understanding of current work on on-line algorithms. Our main result is a constructive representation theorem that uses two choice axioms to characterize maximin, minmax regret, and competitive ratio.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)452-482
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of the ACM
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2000


  • Agent models
  • Choice theory
  • Foundations of online algorithms
  • Qualitative decision theory


Dive into the research topics of 'An axiomatic treatment of three qualitative decision criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this