Anatomical aspects in recurrent pregnancy loss

  • Asher Bashiri
  • , David Gilad
  • , David Yohai
  • , Tullio Ghi

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    1 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In the management of recurrent pregnancy losses, the physician must consider an array of anatomical, structural, and developmental factors that may contribute to the unfavorable reproductive outcome. Some of these anatomical factors can be treated and the chance of good pregnancy outcome improved. Other factors that may increase the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) may resolve without additional medical or surgical therapy. Congenital or acquired uterine abnormalities are among the possible causes of recurrent pregnancy losses, with many other factors including endocrine and immune dysfunction that may co-exist in the same patient. This chapter will review the role of the uterus in the pathophysiology of RPL. We will review the most relevant uterine structural anomalies affecting support of the pregnancy, from congenital malformations such as septate uterus, to acquired lesions such as uterine polyps, adhesions, and leiomyomata. We will also review the optimal treatments for each anomaly and their impact on RPL outcomes.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationRecurrent Pregnancy Loss
    Subtitle of host publicationEvidence-Based Evaluation, Diagnosis and Treatment
    PublisherSpringer International Publishing
    Pages89-107
    Number of pages19
    ISBN (Electronic)9783319274522
    ISBN (Print)9783319274508
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

    Keywords

    • 3D ultrasound
    • Acquired uterine malformation
    • Congenital uterine malformations
    • Mullerian anomalies
    • Myomas
    • Septated uterus
    • Uterine polyp
    • Uterine synechia

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Health Professions
    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Anatomical aspects in recurrent pregnancy loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this