Abstract
Alternations between 'transitive' and 'intransitive' verbs in Blackfoot signal neither an aspectual shift nor the addition or suppression of internal arguments. Rather, 'transitive' morphology formally licenses DP objects; 'intransitive' morphology allows NP, CP, or no object. The relevant morphology, which constitutes v, also determines animacy and theta-role of the external argument.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191720536 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780199544325 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Animacy
- Argument structure
- Aspect
- Blackfoot
- Little v
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Animacy in Blackfoot'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver