TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibody responses to protein A in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis
AU - Greenberg, D. P.
AU - Bayer, A. S.
AU - Turner, D.
AU - Ward, J. I.
PY - 1990/1/1
Y1 - 1990/1/1
N2 - To assess the significance of antibody to Staphylococcus aureus protein A (SpA) in human sera, we developed a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). SpA antibody levels in 23 patients with S. aureus endocarditis (IE), 21 patients with non-IE S. aureus bacteremia, and 33 controls were measured. Geometric mean levels of antibody to SpA were significantly higher in S. aureus IE patients (134 ELISA units [EU] than in uninfected controls (52 EU; P<0.01). Also, a significantly greater proportion of S. aureus IE patients (12 of 23) and S. aureus non-IE bacteremia patients (11 of 21) had antibody levels greater than an arbitrary threshold of 100 EU compared with uninfected controls (0 of 23; P≤0.001). However, no significant differences in geometric mean SpA antibody levels between the bacteremic patients with and without IE were noted. The sensitivity and specificity of this ELISA to distinguish patients with S. aureus IE from those with non-IE bacteremia were low (52 and 48%, respectively). There was a significant association between SpA antibody levels and either immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M teichoic acid antibody levels (r = 0.406, P<0.05; r = 0.571, P = 0.002, respectively). For patients from whom multiple sera were available (13 IE and 5 non-IE patients), SpA antibody levels were measured over time and showed a wide temporal variation of immune responses. We concluded that antibody responses to SpA can be measured in many patients with invasive S. aureus disease but that the levels are of insufficient sensitivity or specificity to be of clinical use as a diagnostic or prognostic test.
AB - To assess the significance of antibody to Staphylococcus aureus protein A (SpA) in human sera, we developed a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). SpA antibody levels in 23 patients with S. aureus endocarditis (IE), 21 patients with non-IE S. aureus bacteremia, and 33 controls were measured. Geometric mean levels of antibody to SpA were significantly higher in S. aureus IE patients (134 ELISA units [EU] than in uninfected controls (52 EU; P<0.01). Also, a significantly greater proportion of S. aureus IE patients (12 of 23) and S. aureus non-IE bacteremia patients (11 of 21) had antibody levels greater than an arbitrary threshold of 100 EU compared with uninfected controls (0 of 23; P≤0.001). However, no significant differences in geometric mean SpA antibody levels between the bacteremic patients with and without IE were noted. The sensitivity and specificity of this ELISA to distinguish patients with S. aureus IE from those with non-IE bacteremia were low (52 and 48%, respectively). There was a significant association between SpA antibody levels and either immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M teichoic acid antibody levels (r = 0.406, P<0.05; r = 0.571, P = 0.002, respectively). For patients from whom multiple sera were available (13 IE and 5 non-IE patients), SpA antibody levels were measured over time and showed a wide temporal variation of immune responses. We concluded that antibody responses to SpA can be measured in many patients with invasive S. aureus disease but that the levels are of insufficient sensitivity or specificity to be of clinical use as a diagnostic or prognostic test.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025117358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/jcm.28.3.458-462.1990
DO - 10.1128/jcm.28.3.458-462.1990
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0025117358
SN - 0095-1137
VL - 28
SP - 458
EP - 462
JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
IS - 3
ER -