TY - GEN
T1 - APPROACHES TOWARD PHYSICAL AND GENERAL VIDEO ANOMALY DETECTION
AU - Kart, Laura
AU - Cohen, Niv
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - In recent years, many works have addressed the problem of finding never-seen-before anomalies in videos. Yet, most work has been focused on detecting anomalous frames in surveillance videos taken from security cameras. Meanwhile, the task of anomaly detection (AD) in videos exhibiting anomalous mechanical behavior, has been mostly overlooked. Anomaly detection in such videos is both of academic and practical interest, as they may enable automatic detection of malfunctions in many manufacturing, maintenance, and real-life settings. To assess the potential of the different approaches to detect such anomalies, we evaluate two simple baseline approaches: (i) Temporal-pooled image AD techniques. (ii) Density estimation of videos represented with features pretrained for video-classification. Development of such methods calls for new benchmarks to allow evaluation of different possible approaches. We introduce the Physical Anomalous Trajectory or Motion (PHANTOM) dataset, which contains six different video classes. Each class consists of normal and anomalous videos. The classes differ in the presented phenomena, the normal class variability, and the kind of anomalies in the videos. We also suggest an even harder benchmark where anomalous activities should be spotted on highly variable scenes.
AB - In recent years, many works have addressed the problem of finding never-seen-before anomalies in videos. Yet, most work has been focused on detecting anomalous frames in surveillance videos taken from security cameras. Meanwhile, the task of anomaly detection (AD) in videos exhibiting anomalous mechanical behavior, has been mostly overlooked. Anomaly detection in such videos is both of academic and practical interest, as they may enable automatic detection of malfunctions in many manufacturing, maintenance, and real-life settings. To assess the potential of the different approaches to detect such anomalies, we evaluate two simple baseline approaches: (i) Temporal-pooled image AD techniques. (ii) Density estimation of videos represented with features pretrained for video-classification. Development of such methods calls for new benchmarks to allow evaluation of different possible approaches. We introduce the Physical Anomalous Trajectory or Motion (PHANTOM) dataset, which contains six different video classes. Each class consists of normal and anomalous videos. The classes differ in the presented phenomena, the normal class variability, and the kind of anomalies in the videos. We also suggest an even harder benchmark where anomalous activities should be spotted on highly variable scenes.
KW - Anomaly Detection
KW - Video Anomaly Detection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131233822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICASSP43922.2022.9747367
DO - 10.1109/ICASSP43922.2022.9747367
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85131233822
T3 - ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings
SP - 1785
EP - 1789
BT - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2022 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
T2 - 47th IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2022
Y2 - 23 May 2022 through 27 May 2022
ER -