TY - GEN
T1 - Are evolutionary computation-based methods comparable to state-of-the-art non-evolutionary methods for community detection?
AU - Hauptman, Ami
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2016/7/20
Y1 - 2016/7/20
N2 - One important aspect of graphs representing complex sys- tems is community (or group) structure|assigning vertices to groups, which have dense intra-group connections and relatively sparse inter-group connections. Community de- tection is of great importance in various domains, where real-world complex systems are represented as graphs, since communities facilitate our understanding of the graph and thus of the underlying system. However, this is known to be a hard optimization problem. In this study we pursue the following question: Have Evo- lutionary Computation-Based Methods proven their worth for this complex domain, or is it currently better to rely on other state-of-the-art methods? While several works com- pare state-of-the-art methods for community detection (see [8] and [11] for recent surveys), we are unaware of other attempts to compare methods based on evolutionary com- putation to other methods. After describing some recent algorithms for this problem, and comparing them in various ways, we conclude that evo- lutionary computation-based method for community detec- tion have indeed developed to hold their own against other methods for several variants of this problem. However, they still need to be applied to more difficult problems and im- prove further to make them in par with other methods.
AB - One important aspect of graphs representing complex sys- tems is community (or group) structure|assigning vertices to groups, which have dense intra-group connections and relatively sparse inter-group connections. Community de- tection is of great importance in various domains, where real-world complex systems are represented as graphs, since communities facilitate our understanding of the graph and thus of the underlying system. However, this is known to be a hard optimization problem. In this study we pursue the following question: Have Evo- lutionary Computation-Based Methods proven their worth for this complex domain, or is it currently better to rely on other state-of-the-art methods? While several works com- pare state-of-the-art methods for community detection (see [8] and [11] for recent surveys), we are unaware of other attempts to compare methods based on evolutionary com- putation to other methods. After describing some recent algorithms for this problem, and comparing them in various ways, we conclude that evo- lutionary computation-based method for community detec- tion have indeed developed to hold their own against other methods for several variants of this problem. However, they still need to be applied to more difficult problems and im- prove further to make them in par with other methods.
KW - Cluster Analysis
KW - Community Detection
KW - Genetic Algorithms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986253867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2908961.2931643
DO - 10.1145/2908961.2931643
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84986253867
T3 - GECCO 2016 Companion - Proceedings of the 2016 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
SP - 1465
EP - 1466
BT - GECCO 2016 Companion - Proceedings of the 2016 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
A2 - Friedrich, Tobias
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 2016 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2016 Companion
Y2 - 20 July 2016 through 24 July 2016
ER -