Assessment of anger terms in Hebrew: A gender comparison

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Appraisal of anger terms is based on past experience recollections, social norms, and gender roles. The objectives of this study were to find combinations of emotional components presented by a new composite variable that will exhibit differences between genders and differentiate between anger terms in Hebrew. The sample was comprised of forty students, Hebrew native speakers who participated in a web based study. Participants were asked to rate eight anger terms in Hebrew on a number of features that comprised five emotional components: subjective feelings states body reactions, expressions, action tendencies, and cognitive evaluations. A two-factor between-subjects multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted. A simplified multivariate composite, defined as subjective experience minus regulation, explained 10% of the gender difference. Another simplified composite, which combines the additive effect of the subjective experience and the actions that accompany this emotional state, explained 14% of difference between the anger terms. The findings are discussed with respect to appraisal theory and social constructivist conceptualization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-324
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied
Volume149
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Apr 2015

Keywords

  • anger terms
  • appraisal
  • emotional components
  • gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Psychology (all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of anger terms in Hebrew: A gender comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this