TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of pathogenic bacteria in treated graywater and irrigated soils
AU - Benami, Maya
AU - Gross, Amit
AU - Herzberg, Moshe
AU - Orlofsky, Ezra
AU - Vonshak, Ahuva
AU - Gillor, Osnat
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Ashraf al-Ashab and the families who contributed GW and soil to this research. This study was supported by the Rosenzweig-Coopersmith Foundation and the Zuck Macabi Fund .
PY - 2013/8/1
Y1 - 2013/8/1
N2 - Reuse of graywater (GW) for irrigation is recognized as a sustainable solution for water conservation. One major impediment for reuse of GW is the possible presence of pathogenic microorganisms. The presence and abundance of six pathogens and indicators were investigated in three GW recirculating vertical flow constructed wetland treatment systems and their respective irrigated yard soils. The treated GW and soils were monitored once every two months for six months using real-time quantitative PCR. As a control, samples from four soils irrigated with fresh water (FW) were similarly analyzed for pathogens and indicators. Comparable types of pathogens and fecal indicator bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, and Shigella spp., were found in the treated GW, their corresponding irrigated soils and the FW-irrigated soils. Moreover, the abundance of these bacteria in the GW- and FW-irrigated soils was of the same order of magnitude, suggesting that the source of the pathogens cannot be established. Our results suggest that GW irrigation has no effect on the diversity and abundance of the tested pathogens and indicators in yard soils.
AB - Reuse of graywater (GW) for irrigation is recognized as a sustainable solution for water conservation. One major impediment for reuse of GW is the possible presence of pathogenic microorganisms. The presence and abundance of six pathogens and indicators were investigated in three GW recirculating vertical flow constructed wetland treatment systems and their respective irrigated yard soils. The treated GW and soils were monitored once every two months for six months using real-time quantitative PCR. As a control, samples from four soils irrigated with fresh water (FW) were similarly analyzed for pathogens and indicators. Comparable types of pathogens and fecal indicator bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, and Shigella spp., were found in the treated GW, their corresponding irrigated soils and the FW-irrigated soils. Moreover, the abundance of these bacteria in the GW- and FW-irrigated soils was of the same order of magnitude, suggesting that the source of the pathogens cannot be established. Our results suggest that GW irrigation has no effect on the diversity and abundance of the tested pathogens and indicators in yard soils.
KW - Graywater
KW - Irrigation
KW - Pathogen
KW - QPCR
KW - Soil
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877830031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.023
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 23666359
AN - SCOPUS:84877830031
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 458-460
SP - 298
EP - 302
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
ER -