Abstract
Balancing the representation of ecosystems and threatened species habitats is critical for optimizing protected area (PA) networks and achieving the Convention on Biological Diversity strategic goals. Here we provide a systematic approach for maximizing representativeness of ecosystems and threatened species within a constrained total PA network size, using Australia as a case study. We show that protection of 24.4% of Australia is needed to achieve 17% representation for each ecosystem and all threatened species habitat targets. When the size of the PA estate is constrained, trade-off curves between ecosystem and species targets are J-shaped, indicating potential “win-win” configurations. For example, optimally increasing the current PA network to 17% could protect 9% of each ecosystem and ensure that all threatened species achieve at least 78% of their targets. This method of integrating species and ecosystem targets in PA planning allows nations to maximize different PA goals under financial and geographical constraints.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 438-445 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Conservation Letters |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Nov 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- CBD Aichi targets
- ecosystem-based targets
- financial and geographical constraints
- maximizing representativeness
- protected area network
- trade-offs
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation