Bayesian fluorescence in situ hybridisation signal classification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous research has indicated the significance of accurate classification of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) signals for the detection of genetic abnormalities. Based on well-discriminating features and a trainable neural network (NN) classifier, a previous system enabled highly-accurate classification of valid signals and artefacts of two fluorophores. However, since this system employed several features that are considered independent, the naive Bayesian classifier (NBC) is suggested here as an alternative to the NN. The NBC independence assumption permits the decomposition of the high-dimensional likelihood of the model for the data into a product of one-dimensional probability densities. The naive independence assumption together with the Bayesian methodology allow the NBC to predict a posteriori probabilities of class membership using estimated class-conditional densities in a close and simple form. Since the probability densities are the only parameters of the NBC, the misclassification rate of the model is determined exclusively by the quality of density estimation. Densities are evaluated by three methods: single Gaussian estimation (SGE; parametric method), Gaussian mixture model assuming spherical covariance matrices (GMM; semi-parametric method) and kernel density estimation (KDE; non-parametric method). For low-dimensional densities, the GMM generally outperforms the KDE that tends to overfit the training set at the cost of reduced generalisation capability. But, it is the GMM that loses some accuracy when modelling higher-dimensional densities due to the violation of the assumption of spherical covariance matrices when dependent features are added to the set. Compared with these two methods, the SGE and NN provide inferior and superior performance, respectively. However, the NBC avoids the intensive training and optimisation required for the NN, demanding extensive resources and experimentation. Therefore, when supporting these two classifiers, the system enables a trade-off between the NN performance and NBC simplicity of implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-316
Number of pages16
JournalArtificial Intelligence in Medicine
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2004

Keywords

  • Bayesian network
  • Density estimation
  • Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)
  • Gaussian mixture model
  • Naive Bayesian classifier
  • Signal classification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bayesian fluorescence in situ hybridisation signal classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this