TY - GEN
T1 - Behavior analysis of grid-map based sensor fusion algorithms
AU - Cohen, Ofir
AU - Gil, Shayer
AU - Korach, Ephraim
AU - Edan, Yael
PY - 2003/12/1
Y1 - 2003/12/1
N2 - Many algorithms for sensor fusion exist; some algorithms have better performance than others. The purpose of this paper is to present a procedure to analyze the behaviour of a sensor fusion algorithm. The analysis reveals the necessary behaviours for performing successful sensory fusion. The analysis methodology was developed for a sensor fusion framework, which assumes three basic concepts: Logical sensors, grid map paradigm and performance measures. Behaviour analysis of the sensor fusion algorithms is conducted by analyzing transition matrices. Three types of behaviours are characterized: Normal, dissimilarity and hysteresis. Five algorithms were compared: Three logical algorithms (AND, OR and MOST) and two adaptive algorithms: Adaptive Fuzzy Logic algorithm and adaptive Dempster Shafer algorithm. The analysis indicated that the MOST, OR and adaptive Fuzzy Logic algorithms are all normal, but the adaptive Fuzzy Logic algorithm has better performance. The adaptive Dempster Shafer has dissimilarity and therefore in some cases diverges.
AB - Many algorithms for sensor fusion exist; some algorithms have better performance than others. The purpose of this paper is to present a procedure to analyze the behaviour of a sensor fusion algorithm. The analysis reveals the necessary behaviours for performing successful sensory fusion. The analysis methodology was developed for a sensor fusion framework, which assumes three basic concepts: Logical sensors, grid map paradigm and performance measures. Behaviour analysis of the sensor fusion algorithms is conducted by analyzing transition matrices. Three types of behaviours are characterized: Normal, dissimilarity and hysteresis. Five algorithms were compared: Three logical algorithms (AND, OR and MOST) and two adaptive algorithms: Adaptive Fuzzy Logic algorithm and adaptive Dempster Shafer algorithm. The analysis indicated that the MOST, OR and adaptive Fuzzy Logic algorithms are all normal, but the adaptive Fuzzy Logic algorithm has better performance. The adaptive Dempster Shafer has dissimilarity and therefore in some cases diverges.
KW - Data fusion
KW - Logical sensors
KW - Mobile robots
KW - Performance analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542621237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:1542621237
SN - 0889863571
T3 - Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications
SP - 201
EP - 206
BT - Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications
A2 - Hamza, M.H.
T2 - Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications
Y2 - 25 June 2003 through 27 June 2003
ER -