Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Beyond Prototypicality: Identity Leadership Is About Shaping and Embedding a Sense of Social Identity, Not Just Representing It

  • Jérémy E. Wilson-Lemoine
  • , Martyna D. Swiatczak
  • , Niklas K. Steffens
  • , Rolf van Dick
  • , Rudolf Kerschreiter
  • , Serap Arslan Akfirat
  • , Lorenzo Avanzi
  • , Christine Joy A. Ballada
  • , Bita Barghi
  • , Tahir Bazarov
  • , John Jamir Benzon R. Aruta
  • , Aldijana Bunjak
  • , Matej Černe
  • , Kitty Dumont
  • , Charlotte M. Edelmann
  • , Olga Epitropaki
  • , Katrien Fransen
  • , Cristina García-Ael
  • , Steffen R. Giessner
  • , Ilka H. Gleibs
  • Dorota Godlewska-Werner, Ronit Kark, Ana Laguia Gonzalez, Hodar Lam, Jukka Lipponen, Anna Lupina-Wegener, Yannis Markovits, Mazlan Maskor, Fernando J. Molero Alonso, Lucas Monzani, Juan A. Moriano Leon, Pedro Neves, Gábor Orosz, Diwakar Pandey, Daniela Pauknerová, Sylwiusz Retowski, Christine Roland-Lévy, Adil Samekin, Sebastian C. Schuh, Tomoki Sekiguchi, Lynda Jiwen Song, Joana Story, Jeroen Stouten, Liliya Sultanova, Srinivasan Tatachari, Daniel Valdenegro, Lisanne van Bunderen, Dina Van Dijk, Viktor Vörös, Sut I. Wong, Farida Youssef, Xin an Zhang, S. Alexander Haslam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Research inspired by the social identity theory of leadership has focused predominantly on the importance of a leader being seen to be representative of the groups they lead. However, beyond this, research suggests that leaders also need to create, advance, and embed a sense of shared social identity in those groups. In the present research, we explore how these different facets of identity leadership combine to form distinct leader profiles. We draw on two heterogeneous independent samples from the Global Identity Leadership Development project (N = 7682; N = 7855) to explore profiles of leaders’ engagement in identity leadership. In both studies, a latent profile analysis of the results of a CFA using a bifactor-(S − 1) model was conducted. In each case, the analysis identified two different predominant identity leadership profiles: ‘engaged identity leaders’ and ‘moderate-inconsistent identity leaders’. Employees working with engaged identity leaders reported substantially more positive job-related attitudes. The results were very similar across the two studies and suggest that this profile analysis is generalizable. The findings support suggestions that identity leadership is multidimensional rather than solely a matter of identity prototypicality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-270
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • bifactor-(S − 1) model
  • identity leadership inventory
  • latent profile analysis
  • leadership
  • social identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond Prototypicality: Identity Leadership Is About Shaping and Embedding a Sense of Social Identity, Not Just Representing It'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this