TY - JOUR
T1 - Bibliometrics
T2 - Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics
AU - Agarwal, Ashok
AU - Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi
AU - Tatagari, Sindhuja
AU - Esteves, Sandro C.
AU - Harlev, Avi
AU - Henkel, Ralf
AU - Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep
AU - Homa, Sheryl
AU - Puchalt, Nicolás Garrido
AU - Ramasamy, Ranjith
AU - Majzoub, Ahmad
AU - Dao Ly, Kim
AU - Tvrda, Eva
AU - Assidi, Mourad
AU - Kesari, Kavindra
AU - Sharma, Reecha
AU - Banihani, Saleem
AU - Ko, Edmund
AU - Abu-Elmagd, Muhammad
AU - Gosalvez, Jaime
AU - Bashiri, Asher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 AJA, SIMM & SJTU.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist′s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.
AB - Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist′s profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact.
KW - article-level metrics
KW - bibliometrics
KW - citation counts
KW - h-index
KW - impact factor
KW - research databases
KW - research impact
KW - research productivity
KW - traditional metrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957886782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/1008-682X.171582
DO - 10.4103/1008-682X.171582
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26806079
AN - SCOPUS:84957886782
SN - 1008-682X
VL - 18
SP - 296
EP - 309
JO - Asian Journal of Andrology
JF - Asian Journal of Andrology
IS - 2
ER -