TY - JOUR
T1 - Biological reconditioning of sodium enriched zeolite by halophytes
T2 - case study of dairy farm effluent treatment
AU - Orlofsky, Ezra
AU - Chernoivanov, Simon
AU - Asiag, Asi
AU - Maor, Ido
AU - Levi, Nimrod
AU - Litaor, M. Iggy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Migal Galilee Research Institute.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Constructed wetlands (CW) containing clinoptilolite zeolite and planted with five halophytes (Sesvium portulacastrum, Juncus effusus, Suaeda monoica, Inula crithmoides and Sarcocornia fruticosa) were irrigated with treated dairy farm effluent. The CW were operated for two years with retention time ranging from 2 to 7 d. Plant species did not affect SAR which was reduced in all treatments from 4.85 to 2.59 (mmol/L)0.5 due to ion exchange in zeolite. Halophytes increased evapotranspiration to 30 mm d−1 which countered sodium removal. Zeolite planted with Sesuvium portulacastrum had 15% lower sodium percentage (ESP, F1,118 = 12.53, p = 0.0006) and 5% higher calcium percentage (F1,118 = 7.44, p = 0.007) compared to non-planted zeolite, indicating reconditioning of zeolite with respect to sodium. Enhancement of SAR removal capability by reconditioned zeolite was demonstrated in 24 h batch experiments on excavated zeolite (n = 6) with saline water (SAR = 0, 17.6, 62.8, and 122.8 (mmol/L)0.5). Zeolite from Sesuvium planted CW reduced SAR to a greater extent than non-planted zeolite and was significant for inlet SAR 17.6 which was reduced to 3.33 ± 0.3 (mmol/L)0.5 compared to 3.68 ± 0.12 by non-planted zeolite (p < 0.05). In-situ biological reconditioning of active matrix in CW by tailored macrophytes is a novel strategy that may be applicable to other pollutants.
AB - Constructed wetlands (CW) containing clinoptilolite zeolite and planted with five halophytes (Sesvium portulacastrum, Juncus effusus, Suaeda monoica, Inula crithmoides and Sarcocornia fruticosa) were irrigated with treated dairy farm effluent. The CW were operated for two years with retention time ranging from 2 to 7 d. Plant species did not affect SAR which was reduced in all treatments from 4.85 to 2.59 (mmol/L)0.5 due to ion exchange in zeolite. Halophytes increased evapotranspiration to 30 mm d−1 which countered sodium removal. Zeolite planted with Sesuvium portulacastrum had 15% lower sodium percentage (ESP, F1,118 = 12.53, p = 0.0006) and 5% higher calcium percentage (F1,118 = 7.44, p = 0.007) compared to non-planted zeolite, indicating reconditioning of zeolite with respect to sodium. Enhancement of SAR removal capability by reconditioned zeolite was demonstrated in 24 h batch experiments on excavated zeolite (n = 6) with saline water (SAR = 0, 17.6, 62.8, and 122.8 (mmol/L)0.5). Zeolite from Sesuvium planted CW reduced SAR to a greater extent than non-planted zeolite and was significant for inlet SAR 17.6 which was reduced to 3.33 ± 0.3 (mmol/L)0.5 compared to 3.68 ± 0.12 by non-planted zeolite (p < 0.05). In-situ biological reconditioning of active matrix in CW by tailored macrophytes is a novel strategy that may be applicable to other pollutants.
KW - Halophyte
KW - reconditioning
KW - zeolites
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089174237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15226514.2020.1799932
DO - 10.1080/15226514.2020.1799932
M3 - Article
C2 - 32772551
AN - SCOPUS:85089174237
SN - 1522-6514
VL - 23
SP - 1001
EP - 1012
JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation
JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation
IS - 10
ER -