Bipolar nanochannels: The effects of an electroosmotic instability. Part 2. Time-Transient response

The most common method to characterize the electrical response of a nanofluidic system is through its steady-state current-voltage response. In Part 1, we demonstrated that this current-voltage response depends on the geometry, the layout of the surface charge and the effects of advection. We demonstrated that each configuration has a unique steady-state signature. Here, we will elucidate the behaviour of the time-Transient response. Similar to the steady-state response, we will show that each configuration has its own unique time-Transient signature when subjected to electroosmotic instability. We show that bipolar systems behave differently than unipolar systems. In unipolar systems, the instability appears only at one end of the system. In contrast, in bipolar systems the instability will either appear on both sides of the nanochannel or not at all. If it does appear on both sides, the instability will eventually vanish on one or both sides of the system. In Part 1, these phenomena were explained using steady-state considerations of the behaviour of the fluxes. Here, we will examine the time-Transient behaviour to reveal the governing principles that are, on the one hand, not so different from unipolar systems and, on the other hand, remarkably different.