TY - JOUR
T1 - Blind competition on the numerical simulation of slabs reinforced with conventional flexural reinforcement and fibers subjected to punching loading configuration
AU - Barros, Joaquim A.O.
AU - Sanz, Beatriz
AU - Filho, Marcílio
AU - Kabele, Petr
AU - Yu, Rena C.
AU - Meschke, Günther
AU - Planas, Jaime
AU - Cunha, Vitor
AU - Neu, Gerrit E.
AU - Caggiano, Antonio
AU - Gouveia, Ventura
AU - Ozyurt, Nilüfer
AU - Poveda, Elisa
AU - van den Bos, Ab
AU - Červenka, Jan
AU - Gal, Erez
AU - Rossi, Pierre
AU - Dias-da-Costa, Daniel
AU - Juhasz, Peter K.
AU - Cendón, David
AU - Ruiz, Gonzalo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 fib. International Federation for Structural Concrete.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - This paper describes the 3rd Blind Simulation Competition (BSC) organized by the fib WP 2.4.1 which aims to assess the predictive performance of models based on the finite element method (FEM) for analysis and design of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) structures submitted to loading and support conditions that promote punching failure mode. Fiber reinforcement is used in an attempt to eliminate conventional punching reinforcement and provide technical and economic advantages. The two tested real-size prototypes represent a column-slab interior region of an elevated steel-fiber reinforced concrete (E-SFRC) slab where anti-progressive collapse reinforcement is disposed in the alignment of columns/piles. Despite a punching failure surface being formed in both experimentally tested prototypes at the rupture stage, fiber reinforcement was able to mobilize the yield capacity of the conventional flexural reinforcement, providing high deformation capacity, and ductility to the prototypes. The average post-peak load-carrying capacity of the tested prototypes at a deflection seven times higher than the deflection at yield initiation of the conventional reinforcement was still 90% of the average peak load. Regarding the BSC, a total of 26 proposals were received and involved 94 participants from 29 institutions and 17 countries, with 53.9% using smeared crack models (SCMs), 30.8% a concrete damage plasticity (CDP) model, 3.8% discrete crack models (DCMs) and 11.5% considered as “other models.” From these simulations it was verified, in average terms, that SCM assured the best predictive performance apart from the average strain in the SFRC and the maximum crack width which were better predicted by DCM. More accurate predictions were obtained by using in-house software than by adopting commercial software.
AB - This paper describes the 3rd Blind Simulation Competition (BSC) organized by the fib WP 2.4.1 which aims to assess the predictive performance of models based on the finite element method (FEM) for analysis and design of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) structures submitted to loading and support conditions that promote punching failure mode. Fiber reinforcement is used in an attempt to eliminate conventional punching reinforcement and provide technical and economic advantages. The two tested real-size prototypes represent a column-slab interior region of an elevated steel-fiber reinforced concrete (E-SFRC) slab where anti-progressive collapse reinforcement is disposed in the alignment of columns/piles. Despite a punching failure surface being formed in both experimentally tested prototypes at the rupture stage, fiber reinforcement was able to mobilize the yield capacity of the conventional flexural reinforcement, providing high deformation capacity, and ductility to the prototypes. The average post-peak load-carrying capacity of the tested prototypes at a deflection seven times higher than the deflection at yield initiation of the conventional reinforcement was still 90% of the average peak load. Regarding the BSC, a total of 26 proposals were received and involved 94 participants from 29 institutions and 17 countries, with 53.9% using smeared crack models (SCMs), 30.8% a concrete damage plasticity (CDP) model, 3.8% discrete crack models (DCMs) and 11.5% considered as “other models.” From these simulations it was verified, in average terms, that SCM assured the best predictive performance apart from the average strain in the SFRC and the maximum crack width which were better predicted by DCM. More accurate predictions were obtained by using in-house software than by adopting commercial software.
KW - benchmark
KW - blind simulation competition
KW - nonlinear finite element analysis
KW - punching loading conditions
KW - reinforced concrete slabs
KW - steel fiber reinforced concrete
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200036496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/suco.202400061
DO - 10.1002/suco.202400061
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85200036496
SN - 1464-4177
JO - Structural Concrete
JF - Structural Concrete
ER -