Blood immune cells from people with HIV on antiviral regimens that contain tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) have differential metabolic signatures

Background: Mitochondria regulate immune and organ function. It is unknown whether higher intracellular drug levels observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) treated with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) may alter mitochondrial function and energy production in immune cells in HIV⁽⁺⁾ patients. Methods: Cellular bioenergetics were determined in PBMCs from HIV-1⁽⁻⁾ participants exposed to TAF versus TDF in vitro, at a comparable concentration to a clinically relevant plasma exposure. A decrease in cellular oxygen consumption rate (OCR) at baseline (basal-OCR) and under cellular stress (max-OCR) may suggest mitochondrial dysfunction. We also assessed the in vivo impact of TAF vs TDF on OCR in PBMCs from 26 people with HIV (PWH) interchanged from TDF-based to TAF-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) over a 9-month period in the setting of an open label clinical trial. The Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney tests were used for comparison of continuous variables. Results: PBMCs from HIV-1⁽⁻⁾ participants exposed in vitro to a concentration of 0.12–3.3 μM for TAF and TDF at 2 and 24 h, reduced basal and maximal OCR compared to vehicle control. Switch studies of antivirals (TAF vs TDF) within the same PWH showed that TAF-based ART was associated with reduced OCR compared to TDF-based ART in PBMCs. We observed that TAF-treated PBMCs selectively relied more on glucose/pyruvate supply rather than fatty acid to fuel their mitochondria. Conclusions: Compared to TDF, TAF may alter bioenergetics in immune cells from PWH in vitro and in vivo. The clinical significance in terms of the differential impact caused by TAF versus TDF on mitochondrial function and energy production in immune cells, a regulator of immune function, requires further studied in HIV, preexposure prophylaxis and hepatitis B.