Bringing women’s voices back in: Conducting narrative analysis in IR

Ayelet Harel-Shalev, Shir Daphna-Tekoah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

In exploring wars and conflicts, Critical Security Studies and Feminist International Relations (IR) use various methodologies, including nontraditional avenues of inquiry. This study follows these theoretical and methodological perspectives and suggests a methodology that will contribute to contemporary debates in IR. Specifically, the study offers an innovative application of Carol Gilligan’s method, the “Listening Guide” (LG). The research demonstrates the utility of the LG analysis in uncovering additional forms of knowledge regarding armed conflicts. The context for analysis is women in combat. The implementation of the LG assists us in uncovering various voices, representing different aspects of the women combatants’ experiences in a conflict zone. In this study, this analytical tool, applied to conduct narrative research, enabled the researchers to hear both multiple and silenced voices. We suggest that this methodology should continue to be used in future studies and incorporated into the Security Studies and IR toolkit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-194
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Female combatants
  • Feminist IR
  • Narrative analysis in IR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing women’s voices back in: Conducting narrative analysis in IR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this