TY - JOUR
T1 - Cain as the Scion of Satan
T2 - The Evolution of a Gnostic Myth in the Zohar
AU - Yisraeli, Oded
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 2016.
PY - 2016/1/6
Y1 - 2016/1/6
N2 - The relationship between kabbalistic thought and ancient gnostic ideas has been debated by numerous scholars. Early on, Gershom Scholem argued that the rise of kabbalah represents the reappearance, in the heart of Judaism, of the gnostic tradition. In his wake, Isaiah Tishby has posited that the concept of the sěfirot emerge[d] and develop[ed] from a historico-literary contact with the remnants of Gnosticism, which were preserved over a period of many generations in certain Jewish circles, until they found their way to the early Kabbalists. Joseph Dan, on the other hand, maintains that historical connections must not be confused with phenomenological similarities. There is no evidence for the existence of the former, in his opinion; all that may be claimed is a typological correspondence between gnostic ideas and medieval Jewish kabbalistic mysticism. Moshe Idel likewise claims that some early Jewish motifs penetrated gnostic texts at the same time they continued to flourish within Jewish circles until they finally found form in medieval kabbalah. Yehuda Liebes has adopted a corresponding view, although he makes fruitful exegetical use of the relationship and parallels between various gnostic and Jewish sources. The issue thus remains firmly on the academic agenda.
AB - The relationship between kabbalistic thought and ancient gnostic ideas has been debated by numerous scholars. Early on, Gershom Scholem argued that the rise of kabbalah represents the reappearance, in the heart of Judaism, of the gnostic tradition. In his wake, Isaiah Tishby has posited that the concept of the sěfirot emerge[d] and develop[ed] from a historico-literary contact with the remnants of Gnosticism, which were preserved over a period of many generations in certain Jewish circles, until they found their way to the early Kabbalists. Joseph Dan, on the other hand, maintains that historical connections must not be confused with phenomenological similarities. There is no evidence for the existence of the former, in his opinion; all that may be claimed is a typological correspondence between gnostic ideas and medieval Jewish kabbalistic mysticism. Moshe Idel likewise claims that some early Jewish motifs penetrated gnostic texts at the same time they continued to flourish within Jewish circles until they finally found form in medieval kabbalah. Yehuda Liebes has adopted a corresponding view, although he makes fruitful exegetical use of the relationship and parallels between various gnostic and Jewish sources. The issue thus remains firmly on the academic agenda.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954522040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0017816015000486
DO - 10.1017/S0017816015000486
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954522040
SN - 0017-8160
VL - 109
SP - 56
EP - 74
JO - Harvard Theological Review
JF - Harvard Theological Review
IS - 1
ER -