TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenging the Israeli Occupation Through Testimony and Confession
T2 - the Case of Anti-Denial SMOs Machsom Watch and Breaking the Silence
AU - Helman, Sara
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by RO1AA020203 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and grant RO1DK087913 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. The author would like to thank Mikyung Kang for graphic assistance with figures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/3/3
Y1 - 2015/3/3
N2 - This article analyzes the repertoires of contention and discourse of two Israeli anti-denial movements, Breaking the Silence and Machsom Watch. Through confession and testimony, both social movement organizations (SMOs) demand that Israeli society acknowledge its “problematic present,” which includes human rights violations in the Palestinian Occupied Territories in a situation of ongoing ethno-national conflict, and insist that it take responsibility for this reality and act against it. It is based on the interpretative analyses of both SMOs’ reports. Reports are analyzed as narratives in the context of Israel’s national identity and its main motives which are also constitutive of a culture of collective denial. The article compares the testimonial practices of Machsom Watch to testimonies of women in Truth and Reconciliation Commissions and the confessions of Breaking the Silence veterans to those displayed in Truth and Reconciliation Commissions as well as confessions of veterans during the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Confession and testimony are usually analyzed as blazing the path to a new and inclusive national identity (as was the case in South Africa). In the case of Israel, however, their adoption and mobilization destabilize national identity and turn it into a field of contention.
AB - This article analyzes the repertoires of contention and discourse of two Israeli anti-denial movements, Breaking the Silence and Machsom Watch. Through confession and testimony, both social movement organizations (SMOs) demand that Israeli society acknowledge its “problematic present,” which includes human rights violations in the Palestinian Occupied Territories in a situation of ongoing ethno-national conflict, and insist that it take responsibility for this reality and act against it. It is based on the interpretative analyses of both SMOs’ reports. Reports are analyzed as narratives in the context of Israel’s national identity and its main motives which are also constitutive of a culture of collective denial. The article compares the testimonial practices of Machsom Watch to testimonies of women in Truth and Reconciliation Commissions and the confessions of Breaking the Silence veterans to those displayed in Truth and Reconciliation Commissions as well as confessions of veterans during the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Confession and testimony are usually analyzed as blazing the path to a new and inclusive national identity (as was the case in South Africa). In the case of Israel, however, their adoption and mobilization destabilize national identity and turn it into a field of contention.
KW - Confession and testimony
KW - Israel/Palestine
KW - Repertoires of contention
KW - Social movements in Israel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947026395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10767-015-9198-y
DO - 10.1007/s10767-015-9198-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84947026395
SN - 0891-4486
VL - 28
SP - 377
EP - 394
JO - International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society
JF - International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society
IS - 4
ER -