TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in feeding behavior and patch use by herbivores in response to the introduction of a new predator
AU - Makin, Douglas F.
AU - Chamaillé-Jammes, Simon
AU - Shrader, Adrian M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Oppenheimer family and the Tswalu foundation for allowing us to conduct this research in Tswalu. The University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) approved all aspects of the research design (Ethics code—058/14/Animal). This work was funded by the National Research Foundation (grant number 77582 to AMS), UKZN, GreenMatter, and the Tswalu Foundation. J. Brown, M. Hayward, J. Cromsigt, O. Pays, and 2 anonymous reviewers provided constructive comments on the manuscript.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by the National Research Foundation (grant number 77582 to AMS), UKZN, GreenMatter, and the Tswalu Foundation. J. Brown, M. Hayward, J. Cromsigt, O. Pays, and 2 anonymous reviewers provided constructive comments on the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Society of Mammalogists, www.mammalogy.org.
PY - 2018/4/3
Y1 - 2018/4/3
N2 - Top-order carnivores are naturally returning, or are being reintroduced, in a number of places where they have previously been extirpated. To explore how prey species adjust their antipredator behavior in response to these predators, we measured giving-up densities (GUDs) in experimental feeding patches and time spent vigilant for greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), sable antelope (Hippotragus Niger), and warthogs (Phacochoerus africanus) before and after an introduction of wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Before the introduction, the only predators in the system were cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). After the release, none of the prey species changed their microhabitat preference, in that they all preferred open grasslands to mixed tree and bush-clumps and bush-clumps. However, kudu and sable fed more intensively (i.e., achieved lower GUDs) and had lower vigilance in open grasslands, while reducing their feeding effort (i.e., higher GUDs) and increasing their vigilance near denser vegetation. When the wild dogs denned in the study site, potentially increasing contact with the prey species, the time kudu spent vigilant and their GUDs increased significantly across all patches, and continued to increase over time. In contrast, sable and warthogs stopped feeding from the experimental patches altogether during this period. The change in feeding intensity and vigilance levels by kudu likely reflected an additive antipredator response to both cheetahs and wild dogs, whereas sable and warthogs only responded to the increased risk from the wild dogs. Our results indicate that the addition of wild dogs influenced the foraging-safety trade-off for the 3 prey species, but that the antipredator behaviors utilized by these species to mitigate predation risk varied within the newly established 2-predator system.
AB - Top-order carnivores are naturally returning, or are being reintroduced, in a number of places where they have previously been extirpated. To explore how prey species adjust their antipredator behavior in response to these predators, we measured giving-up densities (GUDs) in experimental feeding patches and time spent vigilant for greater kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), sable antelope (Hippotragus Niger), and warthogs (Phacochoerus africanus) before and after an introduction of wild dogs (Lycaon pictus). Before the introduction, the only predators in the system were cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). After the release, none of the prey species changed their microhabitat preference, in that they all preferred open grasslands to mixed tree and bush-clumps and bush-clumps. However, kudu and sable fed more intensively (i.e., achieved lower GUDs) and had lower vigilance in open grasslands, while reducing their feeding effort (i.e., higher GUDs) and increasing their vigilance near denser vegetation. When the wild dogs denned in the study site, potentially increasing contact with the prey species, the time kudu spent vigilant and their GUDs increased significantly across all patches, and continued to increase over time. In contrast, sable and warthogs stopped feeding from the experimental patches altogether during this period. The change in feeding intensity and vigilance levels by kudu likely reflected an additive antipredator response to both cheetahs and wild dogs, whereas sable and warthogs only responded to the increased risk from the wild dogs. Our results indicate that the addition of wild dogs influenced the foraging-safety trade-off for the 3 prey species, but that the antipredator behaviors utilized by these species to mitigate predation risk varied within the newly established 2-predator system.
KW - GUDs
KW - feeding effort
KW - patch use
KW - predation risk
KW - predator-prey interactions
KW - vigilance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045136199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jmammal/gyx177
DO - 10.1093/jmammal/gyx177
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045136199
SN - 0022-2372
VL - 99
SP - 341
EP - 350
JO - Journal of Mammalogy
JF - Journal of Mammalogy
IS - 2
ER -