Abstract
The significance of E.S. Spelke and colleagues' (E.S. Spelke & C. Hofsten, 1986; E.S. Spelke & R. Kestenbaum, 1986; E.S. Spelke, R. Kestenbaum, D.J. Simons, & D. Wein, 1995) results that conflict with J. Piaget's (1952, 1955) theory of the object concept development was examined by a modified replication of E.S. Spelke and R. Kestenbaum's study. The present study involved 2- to 4-year-olds and events consisting of teddy bear pictures moving along a continuous or discontinuous course, with entering and exiting figures identical (ID) to or different (DIF) from one another. Forty participants in each age group saw all events in random order and gave verbal interpretations. The authors judged ID events as involving 1 object and DIF events as involving 2 objects. Continuity of movement failed to affect judgments of numerical identity. Implications for Piaget's theory and Spelke's theory are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 258-263 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Developmental Psychology |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 1998 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Demography
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Life-span and Life-course Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Children's perception of continuous and discontinuous movement.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver