Choking or delivering under pressure? The case of elimination games in NBA playoffs

Elia Morgulev, Yair Galily

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Neoclassical economic theories foretell that individuals exert the most effort, and consequently produce their best performances, when the net returns to effort are highest. We scanned through 33 NBA seasons and analyzed 1930 playoffs games in order to test this prediction. Analysis of win probabilities in games where one of the two teams faces elimination from the playoffs, demonstrated that the threat of severe losses didn't lead to elevated level of performance. While previous studies analyzed mainly single-level performance in a stable environment, our results shed light on collective performance in a dynamic setting. These findings can be applicable to other realms as we suggest that managers should refrain from deliberate building of high-pressure environments with hopes of achieving performance enhancement effect among their groups.

Original languageEnglish
Article number979
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Issue numberJUN
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Basketball
  • Choking
  • Expected utility theory
  • NBA
  • Playoffs
  • Pressure
  • Stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choking or delivering under pressure? The case of elimination games in NBA playoffs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this