Abstract
Can the Euthydemus illuminate the philosophical significance of sophistry? In answering this question, I ask why the most direct and sustained confrontations between Socrates and the two brothers should all center on time and the soul. The Euthydemus, I argue, is a not primarily a polemic against eristic manipulation of language, but a diagnosis of the soul’s ambiguous unity. It shows that sophistic speech emerges from the soul’s way of relating to its own temporal character and to logos. Stated differently, a central theme of this dialogue is one which, we are repeatedly told, the Greeks had not yet thematized--the nature of interiority.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-305 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |