Classroom strategies for navigating emotions during controversial discussions

Joseph I. Eisman, Tiferet Ani, Timothy J. Patterson, Avi Kaplan, Abby Reisman, Jenni Conrad, Andrew del Calvo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Facilitating discussions on topics perceived as contentious is associated with complex emotions that may disrupt curricular aims. Unsurprisingly, such discussions are generally absent from the classroom. Yet, discussions are one of the most effective pedagogies for deeper learning. Guided by the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity, we frame the dynamics involved when a teacher plans for, enacts, and reflects on a potentially contentious classroom discussion. This framework situates discussion facilitation in a teacher’s identity—the contextualized sense of who they are as a teacher that involves the interplay of their actions, beliefs, emotions, goals, and self-perceptions. We advance a view of discussion facilitation as centered in the teacher’s role and the strategic consideration of the fit between self-knowledge, beliefs about students, discussion content, context, curricular and personal goals, and pedagogical and emotion strategies. We provide strategies for preparing for classroom discussions and navigating emotions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-153
Number of pages15
JournalTheory into Practice
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Classroom strategies for navigating emotions during controversial discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this