TY - JOUR
T1 - Clevidipine in acute heart failure
T2 - Results of the A Study of Blood Pressure Control in Acute Heart Failure - A Pilot Study (PRONTO)
AU - Peacock, W. Frank
AU - Chandra, Abhinav
AU - Char, Douglas
AU - Collins, Sean
AU - Der Sahakian, Guillaume
AU - Ding, Li
AU - Dunbar, Lala
AU - Fermann, Gregory
AU - Fonarow, Gregg C.
AU - Garrison, Norman
AU - Hu, Ming Yi
AU - Jourdain, Patrick
AU - Laribi, Said
AU - Levy, Phillip
AU - Möckel, Martin
AU - Mueller, Christian
AU - Ray, Patrick
AU - Singer, Adam
AU - Ventura, Hector
AU - Weiss, Mason
AU - Mebazaa, Alex
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Background Rapid blood pressure (BP) control improves dyspnea in hypertensive acute heart failure (AHF). Although effective antihypertensives, calcium-channel blockers are poorly studied in AHF. Clevidipine is a rapidly acting, arterial selective intravenous calcium-channel blocker. Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety of clevidipine vs standard-of-care intravenous antihypertensive therapy (SOC) in hypertensive AHF. Methods This is a randomized, open-label, active control study of clevidipine vs SOC in emergency department patients with AHF having systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and dyspnea ≥50 on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Coprimary end points were median time to, and percent attaining, a systolic BP within a prespecified target BP range (TBPR) at 30 minutes. Dyspnea reduction was the main secondary end point. Results Of 104 patients (mean [SD] age 61 [14.9] years, 52% female, 80% African American), 51 received clevidipine and 53 received SOC. Baseline mean (SD) systolic BP and VAS dyspnea were 186.5 (23.4) mm Hg and 64.8 (19.6) mm. More clevidipine patients (71%) reached TBPR than did those receiving SOC (37%; P =.002), and clevidipine was faster to TBPR (P =.0006). At 45 minutes, clevidipine patients had greater mean (SD) VAS dyspnea improvement than did SOC patients (-37 [20.9] vs -28 mm [21.7], P =.02), a difference that remained significant up to 3 hours. Serious adverse events (24% vs 19%) and 30-day mortality (3 vs 2) were similar between clevedipine and SOC, respectively, and there were no deaths during study drug administration. Conclusions In hypertensive AHF, clevidipine safely and rapidly reduces BP and improves dyspnea more effectively than SOC.
AB - Background Rapid blood pressure (BP) control improves dyspnea in hypertensive acute heart failure (AHF). Although effective antihypertensives, calcium-channel blockers are poorly studied in AHF. Clevidipine is a rapidly acting, arterial selective intravenous calcium-channel blocker. Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety of clevidipine vs standard-of-care intravenous antihypertensive therapy (SOC) in hypertensive AHF. Methods This is a randomized, open-label, active control study of clevidipine vs SOC in emergency department patients with AHF having systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and dyspnea ≥50 on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Coprimary end points were median time to, and percent attaining, a systolic BP within a prespecified target BP range (TBPR) at 30 minutes. Dyspnea reduction was the main secondary end point. Results Of 104 patients (mean [SD] age 61 [14.9] years, 52% female, 80% African American), 51 received clevidipine and 53 received SOC. Baseline mean (SD) systolic BP and VAS dyspnea were 186.5 (23.4) mm Hg and 64.8 (19.6) mm. More clevidipine patients (71%) reached TBPR than did those receiving SOC (37%; P =.002), and clevidipine was faster to TBPR (P =.0006). At 45 minutes, clevidipine patients had greater mean (SD) VAS dyspnea improvement than did SOC patients (-37 [20.9] vs -28 mm [21.7], P =.02), a difference that remained significant up to 3 hours. Serious adverse events (24% vs 19%) and 30-day mortality (3 vs 2) were similar between clevedipine and SOC, respectively, and there were no deaths during study drug administration. Conclusions In hypertensive AHF, clevidipine safely and rapidly reduces BP and improves dyspnea more effectively than SOC.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84897046054
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.023
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 24655702
AN - SCOPUS:84897046054
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 167
SP - 529
EP - 536
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 4
ER -