TY - JOUR
T1 - Coevolutionary events in the history of association between jerboas (Rodentia: Dipodidae) and their flea parasites
AU - Krasnov, Boris R.
AU - Shenbrot, Georgy I.
N1 - Funding Information:
Allan Degen (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev) and Katharina Dittmar de la Cruz (Brigham Young University) read an early version of the manuscript and made helpful comments. We thank Lance Durden and Vince Smith for their most valuable comments that improved the manuscript. We also thank Sergei Medvedev (Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg) for providing us with the copies of figures from Yu et al.’s (1990) book. Financial support was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Israel. This is publication No. 146 of the Ramon Science Center and No. 382 of the Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology.
PY - 2002/12/1
Y1 - 2002/12/1
N2 - We studied historical patterns of the association between fleas and jerboas using Brooks parsimony analysis (BPA), tree reconciliation analysis, general parsimony analysis (TreeFitter), and the ParaFit method. A phylogenetic host tree reconstructed by BPA was incongruent with the known host phylogeny and most characters were homoplasious. The optimization of the recoded flea tree on the jerboa tree suggested that the common evolutionary history of fleas and jerboas was characterized mainly by inertia, host switching, and sorting events. There was a geographic pattern in parasite-based jerboa trees. Species with common geographic distribution and/or habitat preferences or common geographic origin tended to cluster together. The fit of the phylogenetic trees of jerboas and their fleas by reconciliation did not need cospeciation, but mainly suggested sorting events. Optimal reconstruction by TreeFitter revealed a significant phylogenetic effect only when the costs of host switching and linear sorting were assumed to be low. The global test performed by ParaFit indicated no global relationship between jerboa and flea phylogenies on either species-species or genus-genus levels. Results of the study suggested that evolutionary history of the jerboa-flea associations involved association by colonization with frequent host switching and linear sorting events, whereas widespread cospeciation was absent. Distribution of fleas on jerboas is, therefore, affected mainly by ecological and geographic factors.
AB - We studied historical patterns of the association between fleas and jerboas using Brooks parsimony analysis (BPA), tree reconciliation analysis, general parsimony analysis (TreeFitter), and the ParaFit method. A phylogenetic host tree reconstructed by BPA was incongruent with the known host phylogeny and most characters were homoplasious. The optimization of the recoded flea tree on the jerboa tree suggested that the common evolutionary history of fleas and jerboas was characterized mainly by inertia, host switching, and sorting events. There was a geographic pattern in parasite-based jerboa trees. Species with common geographic distribution and/or habitat preferences or common geographic origin tended to cluster together. The fit of the phylogenetic trees of jerboas and their fleas by reconciliation did not need cospeciation, but mainly suggested sorting events. Optimal reconstruction by TreeFitter revealed a significant phylogenetic effect only when the costs of host switching and linear sorting were assumed to be low. The global test performed by ParaFit indicated no global relationship between jerboa and flea phylogenies on either species-species or genus-genus levels. Results of the study suggested that evolutionary history of the jerboa-flea associations involved association by colonization with frequent host switching and linear sorting events, whereas widespread cospeciation was absent. Distribution of fleas on jerboas is, therefore, affected mainly by ecological and geographic factors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041352337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1560/6JHJ-JL24-10D3-95XQ
DO - 10.1560/6JHJ-JL24-10D3-95XQ
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0041352337
SN - 0021-2210
VL - 48
SP - 331
EP - 350
JO - Israel Journal of Zoology
JF - Israel Journal of Zoology
IS - 4
ER -