Cognitive bases for effective participation in democratic institutions: Argument skill and juror reasoning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Skills of argument are important for effective consideration of social issues and participation in democratic institutions. Such skills applied to a juror-reasoning task have been found to have a relationship with how well possible verdict choices might be considered. As justice in the jury system requires that jurors give full consideration to the evidence and can find the best fit between evidence and a verdict, the fostering of cognitive skill applied to everyday, non-schooled reasoning contexts is essential. This synthesis of findings from a juror-reasoning project, drawn from a sample of 180 people on jury duty, shows that skills of argument applied to the juror task can be identified and are consistent across contexts and with other skills. It also shows that education and the development of epistemological understandings play roles in variation found in informal reasoning and open-minded consideration of others' claims.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-102
Number of pages30
JournalTheory and Research in Social Education
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive bases for effective participation in democratic institutions: Argument skill and juror reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this