CogTale: an online platform for the evaluation, synthesis, and dissemination of evidence from cognitive interventions studies

Julieta Sabates, Sylvie Belleville, Mary Castellani, Tzvi Dwolatzky, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Amit Lampit, Sharon Simon, Kaarin Anstey, Belinda Goodenough, Serafino Mancuso, Davis Marques, Richard Sinnott, Alex Bahar-Fuchs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are critical in health-related decision-making, and are considered the gold standard in research synthesis methods. However, with new trials being regularly published and with the development of increasingly rigorous standards of data synthesis, systematic reviews often require much expertise and long periods of time to be completed. Automation of some of the steps of evidence synthesis productions is a promising improvement in the field, capable of reducing the time and costs associated with the process. This article describes the development and main characteristics of a novel online repository of cognitive intervention studies entitled Cognitive Treatments Article Library and Evaluation (CogTale). The platform is currently in a Beta Release phase, as it is still under development. However, it already contains over 70 studies, and the CogTale team is continuously coding and uploading new studies into the repository. Key features include advanced search options, the capability to generate meta-analyses, and an up-to-date display of relevant published studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number236
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive interventions
  • Dementia
  • Evidence synthesis
  • Older adults

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CogTale: an online platform for the evaluation, synthesis, and dissemination of evidence from cognitive interventions studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this